Complaint to the Prosecutor General's Office: sample, grounds and procedure

November 7, 2018
Legislation
Natalia Kalinichenko

Many people complain that after contacting government agencies they cannot get the truth. This may be an appeal to Rospotrebnadzor, the Internal Affairs Directorate, or the prosecutor's office. But what to do, where else can you turn? There is another authority, besides the court, where you can write a complaint - to the Prosecutor General's Office.

Reason for contacting

Submitting a petition to the country's prosecutor general is truly a last resort when all authorities have already refused. The main functions of the Prosecutor General's Office include:

coordination of the work of the Ministry of Internal Affairs;
supervisory function over officials and law enforcement agencies at all levels;
oversight of compliance with the interests and rights of all citizens;
supervision of compliance with the requirements of legislative acts by officials;
investigation of especially dangerous crimes and socially significant offenses.

In light of this, we can conclude that it is a complaint to the Prosecutor General’s Office that will allow every citizen to protect their freedoms and rights if other authorities have refused.

At the same time, it should be understood that the Prosecutor General's Office will not conduct an investigation into individual cases of violation of rights, but it will have an impact on officials who shirk their immediate duties or are inactive.

Terminology

Before considering sample complaints to the Prosecutor General's Office, you should decide on the terminology.

A complaint is a document that contains a demand for the restoration of violated rights or a demand for holding specific officials accountable. This is a kind of statement.

Appeal is a fairly broad concept, including statements, complaints, proposals and petitions. Any written or online interaction with law enforcement is considered a referral.

A statement is actually a request or a message about a fact. For example, a statement about the inaction of specific government officials.

A proposal is actually a type of statement that expresses a specific proposal or recommendation regarding the activities of the prosecutor's office or other government body.

Pros of using the service

If you write a complaint through the official website of the prosecutor's office, a person will save himself from having to stand in queues for a long time. Information is provided remotely. You just need to fill out a specialized form and enter personal information. If a person lives in Moscow, you need to apply through the department’s regional portal. A sample complaint to the prosecutor's office in online format is presented on the website.

Video

Using the service entails a number of additional benefits, the list of which includes:

saving time;
filling out the form at any time of the day;
availability of the service throughout Russia;
acceleration of the review procedure.

When can I apply?

It should be understood that writing a letter to the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation is possible only after a number of preliminary appeals to other authorities. For example, if an employer violates the rights of an employee, then you must first contact the labor inspectorate, then the prosecutor’s office, and only after these authorities have refused or are inactive, contact the Prosecutor General’s Office. The same is true for law enforcement agencies. You must first contact the police officer's superior officer, then the district or city prosecutor's office, and only then file a complaint with the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation. If we are talking about a violation of rights within the framework of criminal proceedings, then you can complain about the investigator to the investigative committee and not even contact the district or city prosecutor's office.

In addition, the complaint must be accompanied by copies of documents confirming the fact of inaction or violation of the applicant’s rights by the officials to whom the citizen applied.

Algorithm for filing a complaint through State Services

In order to use the State Services portal, you must have an authorized personal account. Go to the State Services website and enter your username and password. If you don't have your own account, register one. On the main page, go to the “Services” section, select the “Security and Law Enforcement” button. In this section you will see the opportunity to submit an appeal to the prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation. Click the “Submit an Appeal” button, select a subject of the Federation and fill out the electronic form. All data must be clear and truthful.

You will have a field to fill in information about the problem and describe it in detail. You can attach documents to your application, which you will convert into digital form. Once the complaint is completed, send it to the addressee.

Procedure for filing a complaint

Not a single regulatory act of the country provides for a sample complaint to the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation; however, the text of the document must meet certain requirements.

Required blocks:

Document header. The recipient of the complaint and the sender are indicated here. It should be remembered that anonymous applications are not considered by the Prosecutor General's Office.
Contents: “Complaint.”
The main part of the document should contain information about which bodies and which rights were violated. That is, a brief description of the current situation.
Next, specific demands should be put forward, that is, what the applicant wants to receive in the end, after considering the complaint.
Demands can now be made regarding the desired measures to be taken against the official who has violated rights or failed to act. These may be disciplinary measures or specific actions that the official is required to carry out.
At the end of the text, it is necessary to describe the list of documents that are attached and confirm the facts stated in the complaint.

At the very end, the complaint is dated and signed by the applicant with a transcript of his full name.

When a complaint remains unanswered

Here are the reasons why representatives of the authority do not respond to the sent document:

The complaint does not contain the full name of the person applying and a return address for sending a response (in this case, the application will be considered anonymous).
The document does not contain the information required for its mandatory review and approval.
The prosecutor cannot determine the essence of the appeal.
The applicant directly interferes with the competence of the prosecutor's office.
The text of the complaint is unreadable, the specialist cannot identify the person’s details.
The document contains obscene language, insults, and threats against the life and property of other citizens.
There is no clearly discernible logic or meaning in the complaint.

Site Expert

Gavrilova Olga

Work experience as a lawyer - 21 years. Since 2015, he has been an expert of the Commissioner for the Protection of the Rights of Entrepreneurs in the Chelyabinsk Region A.N. Goncharov.

Ask a Question

If the document does not fall within the competence of the prosecutor's office, it is forwarded to the appropriate body that has the right to consider it. The person receives a corresponding notification. If the official paper was left unanswered, you have the right to re-apply; the number of such applications is not limited.

Subtleties of drafting

To file a complaint with the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, you should take into account that this is still a serious regulatory body, therefore the text should not contain errors, corrections, and even more so colloquial words or curses.

The complaint must be submitted in duplicate if it is submitted in person through the office of the institution. The second copy is marked with receipt of the document.

There should be no “water” in the text, only facts, there should be no reasoning and speculation, grievances and personal, unfounded opinions of the applicant.

It is not recommended to draw up a complaint on several sheets, unless it is a collective statement. The fact is that voluminous texts are much more difficult to perceive, and as you read, they only raise unnecessary questions.

The complaint must necessarily contain the applicant’s data and contacts, otherwise the application will be regarded as anonymous, and therefore no response will be received. It is possible that the Prosecutor General’s Office will not even consider such a complaint, and this right is enshrined in law.

What demands can be made?

Filing a complaint to the Prosecutor General's Office implies the opportunity to demand one of two types of influence on an official:

restoration of legal rights in relation to the applicant;
bringing the guilty official to justice.

Practicing lawyers do not recommend demanding prosecution, since, most likely, in response the applicant will receive only a formal reply with the wording: “the official... Full name... was indicated as inadmissible...”. And it is completely in vain to count on the opening of criminal proceedings. Therefore, when drawing up a complaint, it is better to be guided by the norms of the Code of Administrative Offenses, especially if we are talking about a law enforcement officer. After all, what to hide, any leader will keep silent about the “minor pranks” of his subordinates, even if we are not talking about law enforcement agencies. A similar situation occurs in the field of medicine, where doctors stand strong for each other, even if there is clearly a medical error in the actions of the employee.

Under no circumstances should you make demands that are impossible to meet in practice. A complaint to the Prosecutor General's Office must contain only real claims, otherwise the applicant will only receive a reply. Please note that the requirements must be stated specifically and unambiguously.

Write a statement to the prosecutor's office online

From Svetlana Nikolaevna Shekhireva 682950, Khabarovsk region, Vyazemsky st. Kommunisticheskaya, 27, apt. 11 tel. 89098776303

Complaint.

My son Shekhirev G.G. and my family is being persecuted by Fedotova E. and her mother Barinova I.I., specialists from the district hospital of the Vyazemsky district of Vyazemsk, Khabarovsk Territory, for having audio recordings from my son about the frauds of the hospital. I ask you to pay attention to what is written in this statement and make the right decision. My son Shekhirev G.G. 08/03/1998 Upon his release, he registered with the Department of Internal Affairs, and also, having restored his documents, entered the labor exchange. After spending a month at the labor exchange, my son realized that he would not be offered a job and would need to look for someone he knew. As they write in the media, our city does not treat people like my son with help after prison. In our city they will only send you back from where you came - “No person, no problem!” My son found a job as a worker laying paving slabs, but after working for a week, the Department of Internal Affairs officers cleared him out with inspections. It was constant how he found work. What kind of employer would like such visits? This began to happen to him when he met E. Fedotova. His son quit and began a new search. Fedotova E., who has lived in Vyazemsk for 35 years and works as a specialist in the Vyazemsk regional hospital for state procurement, came to my son’s dating site. The son, without hiding about his past, said that he did not have a job and could not be in trouble with her, but Fedotova assured him that she did not need anything, that she was wealthy and would be able to settle everything like her mother Barinova I.I. -chief accountant of the hospital. The chief doctor had a son-in-law in the police, G. Ovcharov, head of the investigation department. Fedotova E. came to my son in a Camry car with a trunk full of alcoholic beverages while intoxicated, having been deprived of her driver’s license for a period of 5 years. When my son asked how she drives a car while intoxicated, she replied that she does not have a driver’s license and that she can drive a car during certain shifts of duty through the acquaintance of traffic police officers. My son and E. Fedotova began to live together on its territory. Living together became an overview of the residents of Vyazemsk. My son was warned that this lady already had many sins, that her husband was promoted for an unknown reason. Fedotova drove around the city with her son while drunk more than once and let my son, who did not have a driver’s license, drive the car. Fedotova E. reacted to my comments with laughter and said that everything is possible, you just need to have weight in this life. The temptation to this irresponsible life led to bad results, as it was not the mother who could have foreseen all this. My son had an accident, that is, while parking a car in a parking lot, he scratched the car of a traffic police officer Vovk E., which was driven by his wife Vovk O. The wife called her husband and told about the accident, the husband advised not to call the traffic police because he wanted to figure it out himself. Later it turned out that Vovk E. is a former good friend of Fedotova E. She borrowed money from Vovk E. more than once and he decided to ask my son for money for the accident, since he lived together with Fedotova E., but my son did not there was money and he refused to pay Vovk E. I advised my son to contact the head of the traffic police and solve this. Together with my son, we turned to the head of the State Traffic Safety Inspectorate of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Vyazemsky district, Didukh N.I. . In response to our statement that his employee was extorting money from my son for an accident, he called Vovk E. and said to get a receipt from my son for compensation of damages and that’s all. I was amazed by the decision that E. Fedotova, who gave my son a car and drove while intoxicated, was left unpunished. Now I believed that in Vyazemsk everything is bought and sold. They simply persecuted my son and created problems and debts for him. My son also continued to live with E. Fedotova, fearing that Fedotova and E. Vovk might put him in prison. E. Fedotova constantly made threats towards her son, if he doesn’t start living with her, then he will be finished. Coming home, the son talked about his life with Fedotova, that she does not work, but drinks, leads an immoral lifestyle and her mother covers for her at work. Barinova I.I. holding the position of chief accountant. I advised him to find a job on a rotational basis and move away from this young lady. In the morning I find out that my son crashed in E. Fedotova’s car, so as not to solve the crime of an accident with Vovk E., she writes a statement about the theft against my son, and a week later she stops the case and writes that this is insignificant damage for her. This case has already been returned from the prosecutor's office 4 times. As Fedotova E. wants. When your son is about to leave and leave. She asks my son to give the gold chain that I gave him in memory of my late father to the pawnshop. Without telling me, he takes the chain to the pawnshop. Having received the money, he transfers it to E. Fedotova for her needs, with the condition that she will later buy it back and give it to him on 08/03/2017. on his birthday. Knowing that if she doesn't buy the chain, my son will wake up on her leash. Fearing that Fedotova might harm him, he regularly recorded it on a dictaphone, because in our time of peace they wouldn’t believe a prisoner. The son went on shift in July, E. Fedotova packed his things and asked him to stay, that they would find a way to pay the debts, that everything would be fine. My son left for work. As soon as my son gets a job, I constantly receive applications from E. Fedotova. My son beats her, robs her, steals a car, but she constantly pursues him with her love and inappropriate behavior. A person who has been treated more than once for alcoholism is involved in state procurement of the Vyazemsk regional hospital and his mother is the chief accountant. In fact, I saw a video on the Internet about a hospital in which a young man named E. Rudenko is trying to reach out to officials about the lawlessness in our hospital, trying to open the eyes of his son. Later, I learn from friends that E. Fedotov and his mother I. Barinova are leaving for a 12-day vacation at sea. Having learned from her daughter who she lived with, she was outraged that she did not want such a criminal son-in-law for her daughter. Fedotova E. told her mother that Shekhirev G. recorded their conversation about work. Barinova contacted her lawyer, who defended Barinova in court more than once. I don’t know what charges she faced. The lawyer advised to get rid of the prisoner by writing a statement after a vacation at sea about the beating of her daughter E. Fedotova, after such a period of time. Working in a hospital, you can write any certificate about beatings. After Fedotova E. returned from the sea, I found out that Fedotova wrote a statement against my son. I called my son at work. After my son’s meeting with Fedotova, I find out that my son took her chain from Fedotova until she buys it from the pawnshop. Fedotova did not expect this, she thought that my son would continue to tolerate her impudence. My son is given 12 days and locked up in a temporary detention facility. My son is losing his job again while serving time in a temporary detention facility. Barinova takes her daughter Fedotova E to a psychiatric hospital and keeps her for 1 month, because in the city of Vyazemsky you can’t hide it from everyone, people start talking about injustice. This is not the first time that an investigator initiates a case where the court makes a decision in the form of compulsory labor. The magistrate constantly orders my son to be kept in a temporary detention facility, knowing that he has an official job. Lawyer Maksimov, who always defends this family and works in court, you can understand which way the wind is blowing. From the outside looking in, it’s as if they said FAS! After the trial, my son avoided meeting with Fedotova. The prosecutor does not sign the documents for the 4th time about the criminal case regarding the Camry car and again sends it to the investigation department for some additional checks. My son is called back from work and this has been going on for a year. I ask you to pay attention to this biased attitude towards my son from prosecutor G.A. Kolomin. and take action. I had to rent an apartment so that my son could live separately without meeting Fedotova. Having been discharged from the hospital, Fedotova again begins to harass my son, calling and threatening him that she will take her own life and her son is trying to save her, and Barinova’s mother calls the police and my son is back in the temporary detention center and this infinity is already tired. Fedotova E. once again breaks up with my son and, as revenge, writes another statement about the disappearance of money. And the next day is 02/22/2018. is in my son’s apartment and drinks alcohol alone. He suffers and cries as she loves and protects him. My son was afraid of another provocation from Fedotova and called me. My daughter, son and granddaughter and I were forced to stay in my son’s apartment. At night, the son again received a call that Fedotova E. was trying to enter the apartment for the second time and was knocking on the windows. I was forced to go back to my son’s apartment. Seeing Fedotova E. intoxicated, I offered to leave the apartment; in response, I received a grin and an answer that I should not interfere in their relationship, that they would sort it out themselves. I was forced to call the police to the house so that they would take E. Fedotova out of the apartment. 02/24/2018 from Barinova I.I. I received a threatening call. At the moment, he was again given 15 days from 02.26-03.13.2018. the judge knew that he was on sick leave, my son had a head injury and she made a decision to keep him in a temporary detention facility. I am amazed by such lawlessness and where this wind blows from. The hunt is on for the recordings that my son recorded. I listened to the recordings and realized that because of these recordings my son simply would not be allowed to live in peace. My son has already tried to take his own life for the second time, because they constantly believe the victim, who has inappropriate behavior. Fedotova E. drinks alcohol with my son, living with him, hiding it from her mother, then blaming my son, then loving him and fearing her mother, who will leave her without the means of her livelihood. Bermuda Triangle. Together with my mother, they constantly write statements against my son in order to influence my psyche. I am the only one working in the family. I have a dependent child who is not an adult, and I also have a daughter and granddaughter living together. This romance and the chaos on the part of Fedotova and Barinova have already crossed all boundaries. This is not the first time that district police officer Tomashevsky has come to my work during my working hours without a summons and is preventing me from working, demanding an explanation for the statements of I.I. Barinova. He doesn’t respond at all to my objection to give any explanations during working hours. He says he was ordered. The district police officer is not at all like our precinct. District police officer S. Zotov actually came to my house at 20.00, also a district police officer from not our station, and also ordered. During the daytime it is difficult to serve a summons or send it by mail. Now it’s probably difficult to do this, it’s better to call on the phone and distract you from work. They interfered with and harmed my son, and now they have taken over me. For a year I did not react to their antics and inappropriate behavior, but I have a family and I am already afraid to walk down the street for my life and the lives of my relatives. I am writing this because I know that Barinova I.I. I contacted the thieves at the base on the street in Vyazemsky. K. Marx to a man nicknamed “Test Tube” and tried to influence and threaten my son with his help. This man met with my son and warned him that Barinova I.I. won't leave him alone. 02/16/2018 my son was hit in the head. At the moment he was on sick leave with a concussion. One can only guess who pierced his head. He has recordings of conversations where Fedotova E talks about the car, chains to people and how she accuses her mother of setting conditions for every statement written against me. Recordings of her parents' conversations at home, as her mother scolds her for using narcotic pills and asks to call the police, luring him into her apartment. A recording about the work and machinations of the district hospital, where it all began, where Fedotova talks about the higher-ranking people behind it. The son wrote this down to protect himself from lies from Barinova and her daughter. He realized that he was not a warrior alone in the field and he needed witnesses who would confirm his appeal to the prosecutor of Khabarovsk. He also concluded that Barinova and Fedotova simply had to present themselves as victims in order to hide their crimes. According to Fedotova, her salary is 24 thousand rubles. and she is raising a minor child in a criminal case in a chain. At the same time, he has 3 cars, gold jewelry, apartments, telephones in the amount of 50 thousand rubles of the latest models and I will not list further. Where did this come from with a salary of 24 thousand rubles and the chief accountant Barinova I.I. who has a better financial situation than her daughter. This is the second time he is trying to take his own life, because there is pressure on him from all sides and he cannot cope alone with this illegality and lawlessness. Throughout the year, my phone number constantly received threatening calls and blackmail from I. I. Barinova and E. Fedotova for compensation for damage caused by my son. Since Barinova I.I. claims that in the city of Vyazemsky everything was seized and bought from her, then I am already beginning to doubt that my family can be protected from these ladies. Not long ago I saw videos of a young 18-year-old guy named Rudenko. He decided to publish an article about our hospital and share with society about the chaos after children began to die after doctors made incorrect diagnoses. I, like my son, am trying to fight and open my eyes to what is going on in the city of Vyazemsky. What do we feed our patients? There are no simple medicines. We know that our hospital is constantly receiving funding, but where does it all go without a trace? There are comments from doctors and junior staff who are also not indifferent, but there are those who write: “If your aunt knows how to steal, let her steal!”

20.04. 2022 The Vyazemsky District Court of the Khabarovsk Territory issued a resolution according to which the petition of the senior investigator of the Department of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Vyazemsky District to extend the period of detention of my son Gennady Gennadievich Shekhirev was denied. In relation to my son Shchekhirev G.G. A preventive measure was chosen in the form of house arrest. In the above court ruling, my son agreed in full. My son, Shekhirev G.G. was accused of committing a crime under paragraph. “c” part 2 of article 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. E.L. Fedotova was recognized as the victim in this criminal case. 03/30/2018 Vyazemsky District Court in relation to my son Shekhirev G.G. a preventive measure in the form of detention was chosen. At that moment, my son was under administrative arrest and kept in the temporary detention center in Vyazemsk since March 22, 2018. until 04/01/2018 03/30/2018 at 17.30 the son was brought to the Vyazemsky district court. Senior investigator of the Investigative Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Vyazemsky district, without notifying my son and me in advance about the court hearing. He and I were unable to prepare for the trial in advance and present evidence to the court. Lawyer Titova, defending my son, did not meet with me and my son at the court hearing and did not include evidence. The lawyer also did not appeal this court decision, but agreed with this decision. Lawyer Maksimova M.N. asserts in his complaint that the court decision of March 30, 2018 was not appealed. My son, Shekhirev G.G. appealed this court decision on 04/02/2018, where it was written in the journal in the temporary detention facility under No. 36, to the Khabarovsk Regional Court, but did not receive a response. To me, Shekhireva S.N. They reported that my son was arrested on April 1, 2018. (Sunday) they brought a message from the investigator and delivered it at home. This evidence and positive characteristics were with me by Shekhireva S.N., for presentation to the lawyer and my son in court. 03/30/2018 at the court hearing, a negative reference was read out at the place of residence for my son Shekhirev G.G. I, Shekhireva S.N. I went through all the residents of the house and it turned out that no one had contacted the residents, they didn’t even know the district police officer by sight and were outraged by the lies. The residents wrote a positive testimonial and signed it. This characteristic was included on April 20, 2018 at the court hearing. Regarding this fact, my son wrote to the prosecutor’s office about all the actions of the investigator, but has not received a response to date, as well as to the fact that investigator Zima K.A. submitted to the court on 03/30/18 and 04/20/18. false documents identifying my son. . 16.04. 18 My son and I submitted a petition to investigator Zima K.A. for inclusion in a criminal case under paragraph. “c” part 2 of article 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation evidence. The content of the audio recordings is full-fledged evidence and also confirms the fact of persecution and illegal actions of the victim E.L. Fedotova. to me and to my son, and also confirms the fact of pressure from Barinova’s mother I.I. give false evidence against my son. Based on the above and guided by Art. Art. 12, 35,55,77 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, I petition for the inclusion of audio recordings in the materials of all criminal and civil cases filed against my son, as well as in the case of the preventive measure in custody of my son as evidence, as well as the calling of witnesses. I was refused in writing. A petition was submitted to the investigator to request SMS messages from the victim, but it was also denied. My son’s request for beatings to be sent for an examination in Khabarovsk and a polygraph was also denied. Petition for inclusion of audio recordings in the case materials dated April 16, 2018. was sent to the investigator, from me Shekhireva S.N. — was satisfied on April 19, 2018. At the court hearing on April 20, 2018, there were no audio recordings included in the criminal case materials, as the investigator says. I, Shekhireva S.N. Having learned about the court hearing 15 minutes in advance. Before the start of the trial, she handed over all the evidence to lawyer V.V. Yakushev, who petitioned the court to include audio recordings and testimonials from the residents, as well as to call witnesses. Petition from me Shekhireva S.N. from 04/16/2018 the presence at the court hearing and information about the date and time of it, as well as a meeting with his son, were denied. This refusal was sent by mail on April 24, 2018, i.e. after the court hearing - dated April 20, 2018. Based on these facts, I conclude that the investigator of the Investigative Department of the Department of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Vyazemsky district, Zima K.A. is biased towards me and my son.16.04. 2022 I, Shekhireva S.N. , also filed a petition to include audio recordings and call witnesses to the court hearing on April 20, 2018. Prosecutor Kolomin G.A. Prosecutor Kolomin G.A. In his appeal submission, he sets out the arguments that the fact that the conversation is actually taking place between the victim and the accused has not been verified. Lawyer Maksimova M.N. c refers in court to the testimony of the victim E.L. Fedotova, but on April 20, 2018, at the court hearing he recognizes the voice of the victim and my son G.G. Shekhirev. and gives an explanation to the audio recordings that on the night of March 21, 2018. as of 03/22/18 on the protocol of the court session that the victim Fedotova E.L. deliberately called my son and asked him to come to her so that the measure of restraint for my son would be changed. Thus, lawyer Maksimov M.N. confirms the fact of the crime, the persecution of the victim E.L. Fedotova. and my son Shekhirev G.G. and forces him to commit violations of supervision, which are referred to in the complaint, which were also committed earlier by him in the presence of the victim E.L. Fedotova, which is confirmed by audio recordings that are attached to the materials of the criminal case. Victim E.L. Fedotova names the time, date on audio recordings, and also indicates witnesses to the fact of that time. Among other things, I have audio recordings of calls from the victim Fedotova for the period 2017-2018, where the victim of my son does not fear for her health and life, as well as for the health of her loved ones. On the night of 21.03-22.03. 18 calls my son and asks him to come at 4 o’clock in the morning to congratulate her on her birthday quietly, so that he doesn’t tell anyone and he won’t be caught that he is violating supervision, thereby provoking him. Early already with a cast on the arm 20.03-21.03. 18 victim Fedotova E.L. I came to my son’s friends and drank alcohol with them on the street. Lenina 26., where she was detained by the district police officer Bevza and the head of the district police stations Karpuk, for questioning by the police and after the interrogation, she was again with my son at this address. The victim communicated with her son kindly in public and did not fear for her life. The included audio recordings confirm the fact of pressure not from my son Shekhirev G.G., but from her mother Barinova I.I. The victim drinks alcohol and narcotic pills to calm herself from the pressure of her mother Barinova I.I., in order to sign statements against me to the police and gives false testimony, and her mother also sets conditions for her to sign statements that are currently in the police. Lawyer Maksimova M.N. submitted to the court hearing on March 30, 2018. Statement from the victim dated April 26, 2018. about fears for your health. My son, 03/22/2018 I talked to the victim for the last time and she kindly persuaded him to come to her, and also in the morning of 03/22/2018. my son filed a complaint against the victim that she was following him everywhere. After interrogation on March 22, 2018. Based on the son’s explanations to the investigator, he was given an administrative punishment and detention in a temporary detention center from 03/22/18-01/04. During this period, he could not threaten the victim E.L. Fedotova. and chase her. A complaint was sent to the prosecutor of Vyazemsky, Khabarovsk, and the Prosecutor General of Moscow from me and from my son. from 03/02/2018 about the persecution of our family and extortion of money from Barinova I.I. and Fedotova E.L. 02/21/2018 on Fedotova E.L. The police were called by me to S.N. Shekhireva, since the victim was staying with my son in a rented apartment at night, intoxicated and preventing him from resting, after reporting the missing money. Prosecutor and lawyer Maksimova M.N. Constantly in his complaint refers to my son's past, without taking into account that he has changed. He recorded the victim in order to prove his innocence, the persecution of the victim, and also to prove the pressure of I.I. Barinova’s mother. on the victim and establishing conditions for signing statements, as well as that the victim Fedotova E.L. is not afraid of him and is looking for meetings with him, after all the printed statements, they also met and had a love relationship. My son is a former prisoner and it’s difficult for him to prove, and they don’t believe him. Currently he has an official job, where he is characterized positively. He took the Far Eastern hectare and registered it as his property in order to build a house and start a family. Together with me, he designed and painted a playground in the courtyard of his house. He strives to live honestly. He was currently under house arrest. He was given a bracelet that controlled all his actions. A telephone is installed in my apartment to communicate with the regulatory inspection. Court findings dated April 20, 2018 are based on an objective and direct examination of all the evidence in the case. All circumstances of legal significance during the consideration of the case were correctly established by the court. The decision gives a proper and correct assessment of the evidence. Arguments stated by prosecutor G.A. Kolomin in the appeal submission. were the subject of verification in the court of first instance, while the court did not reasonably agree with them, as indicated in the court decision. On April 28, 2018, house arrest was canceled and replaced again with custody. In Vyazemsky, they are either imprisoned without evidence, without checking the arguments of the victim, investigator Zima K., then they are released and imprisoned again. Where did the audio recordings come from? An examination is needed, but the investigator is in no hurry, since it is not she who is in custody, but my son. Everyone celebrates the holidays, but some are in grief. This is “A Just Russia”.

I gave such a statement to the prosecutor of the city of Vyazemsky, Khabarovsk. The Vyazemsky Ministry of Internal Affairs refuses to respond and does not give an exact answer to the application. The first accident with Vovk O. and my son is not mentioned anywhere, they want to hide this fact of corruption. Prosecutor Kolomin sends the case for the 5th time for the theft of a car that did not exist. There are not enough sheets in the case, something has been covered up and is being reopened. Only in Vyazemsky, they work like this without evidence to sue and kill a prisoner, he’s not a human being. The victim is believed and does not have to prove anything; she has no arguments, money decides everything. My son petitions the investigator, prosecutor, etc. They refuse everywhere. No one needs evidence. Prosecutor Kolomin G.A. reasons: “Let him write!” no one will believe him anyway. Investigator Zima K. is waiting for his mother, those. I will bring it and do the work for her. They constantly send replies to complaints, everything is fine, the fact was not confirmed, and there were no checks, since the proof of violations is with me. My son wants to get justice. They used him as bait. All administrative punishments were planned and fabricated together with Fedotova, Barinova and Maksimova. Prosecutor Kolomin is afraid of something that might reveal itself. They constantly answer my complaints not accurately and not in full. They constantly remind me that my son was sitting and is waking him up to sit. Just for what? For an inadequate woman who is pursuing him. Send experienced and honest specialists, they are so lacking in this city. I ask you for help, to figure it out and take action.

05/21/2018 Shekhireva S.N.

Complaint to the prosecutor's office against the prosecutor's office

Oddly enough, the very body that is called upon to monitor and prevent violations of the rights and freedoms of citizens and legal entities often remains inactive or completely ignores citizens’ appeals. Most often this manifests itself in:

delaying the consideration of applications and complaints;
a formal approach to the matter, with issuance of a response in the form of an unsubscribe;
inaction of a certain official;
corruption.

Some citizens manage to go through all the “circles of hell”, reach the city prosecutor, but still achieve nothing, but where to go next? Only the Prosecutor General's Office remains. After all, in order to complain even about the district prosecutor, you will first have to contact higher authorities and further down the chain – to the prosecutor general. Even if you cannot find support here, you will have to go to court.

Is it possible to appeal the decision of the prosecutor's office?

If you do not agree with the official response, you can object to it. It is sent in order of subordination. Thus, the decision of the district prosecutor cannot be appealed to the Prosecutor General's Office; in this case, the appeal will be forwarded to a lower authority.

The submitted document will be reviewed within a week, after which you will receive a response. The appeal states:

The name of the authority you are contacting.
Your data.
The essence of the complaint.
Petition (what exactly do you want to achieve with such a document).
Proof of violation of your rights.
Signature and date.

The actions and decisions of the prosecutor can be appealed not only to a higher authority, but also in court, in this case a statement is also drawn up.

Thus, a complaint to the prosecutor’s office is an effective way to protect one’s violated rights and interests, and to bring the violator to justice, even if his role is played by government authorities and high-ranking officials. The main thing is to justify your appeal, provide arguments and evidence of the guilt of the other side.

Terms of consideration

The Prosecutor General's Office, like other regulatory authorities, has 30 days from the moment the document was received to consider complaints. The fact of receipt may be confirmed by a note on acceptance of the complaint or by postal notification.

Such a long period is given on the basis that specialists from the prosecutor’s office need to check all the facts stated in the complaint, interview the official, possibly even the applicant himself.

You should also know that if the applicant did not contact lower authorities before contacting the Prosecutor General's Office, then his complaint will be sent there within 7 days from the date of receipt. These authorities will independently conduct an audit and verify all the facts stated in the document. The applicant will be notified additionally of such a decision.

Internet reception

This is a fairly new service that involves filing a complaint with the Prosecutor General's Office online. At the same time, you should not be afraid that the application will not be processed, it will be considered in the general manner, and the applicant himself will be able to save time.

The Internet reception is located at ipriem.genproc.gov.ru/contacts/ipriem/. Before filing a complaint, it is recommended that you familiarize yourself with the rules for filing and filing a complaint.

All fields marked with “*” must be filled out without fail, otherwise the system will not accept the application. In cases of anonymous application, the applicant will not receive any response.

The complaint must be drawn up in Russian with a logical breakdown into paragraphs and sentences. All applicants have the right to attach additional documents, but the total amount of uploaded information should not exceed 5 MB. Almost all the most common electronic document formats are acceptable for downloading, including video and audio formats.

How to contact a prosecutor online

To file a complaint or other appeal on the website of one of the regional prosecutor's offices, the applicant must fill out an electronic form and indicate the following information:

Full name, email or postal address, contact phone number;
division of the prosecutor's office (district, city) to which the complaint must be forwarded;
type of appeal: application, complaint, petition;
type of appeal: collective complaint, appeal on the fact of violation of rights, violations by officials and others;
nature of the appeal: what kind of legislation was violated;
text of the appeal.

The text of the appeal must include the following information:

description of the circumstances: date and circumstances of contacting an official, purchase, other legal relationship;
information about whose actions are being appealed;
essence of the complaint: what is the violation of the law;
requirements for the prosecutor. Measures that the prosecutor must take: conduct an inspection, issue an order to eliminate violations, bring them to justice.

Note!
The applicant has the right to attach documents and other attachments related to the case in the form of electronic files to his application. Deleted requests in files only, but without the text of the request are not considered.

When filling out the form, the applicant must follow the following recommendations:

All fields must be filled in.
The text of the complaint can only be drawn up in Russian.
The test must contain all the information necessary to consider the issue: information about the location of the violation of the law, the violator, the person whose rights it violates, etc.
The use of obscene language in the text of the appeal is unacceptable.
Anonymous complaints are not permitted. If the applicant's full name and address are not indicated, the prosecutor's office will not respond to it. The functionality of the “Internet reception” does not allow sending such requests.

Results of consideration

The result of filing a complaint about the inaction of the prosecutor’s office to the Prosecutor General’s Office, as well as other types of appeals, may be:

"Satisfactorily". Simply put, this is the best outcome for considering the application, that is, all information has been taken into account, and measures have been taken to resolve the conflict situation.
"Rejected." The applicant may receive such a response if the prosecutor's office regarded the complaint as unfounded and rejected its consideration.
"Clarified." Such a decision is made on complaints that do not contain specific requirements for an official, but only require clarification of legal norms.
"Redirected." The mark indicates that the complaint was accepted, but forwarded to another authority.

When can consideration be refused?

Even if a complaint is drawn up to the Prosecutor General’s Office according to a model that has already been used by many lawyers or other applicants, but a refusal is received, then you should think about it, perhaps you should reconsider your requirements.

First of all, a refusal will be obtained if the complaint requests direct intervention in a specific investigation. As a rule, such requests are responded to within 10 days from the date of submission.

A refusal will necessarily be received if the essence of the problem is unclear, the requirements and evidence are not clear. Illegible handwriting can also be a reason for refusal.

Summary

Absolutely all citizens of the country, legal entities, foreigners and stateless persons have the right to file a complaint with the Prosecutor General. Before this, you will have to contact the senior management of the person who violated the rights or interests of the interested party. The responses received will be confirmation that all authorities did not help or did not try to help the applicant in the current situation.

The regulations do not provide for a sample complaint; however, such a document is official and businesslike. Therefore, the complaint must contain: a header, the title of the document, a descriptive part and a block with the requirements put forward, the signature of the applicant and a list of attached documents. The text should not contain errors or corrections, insults or speculation.

You can submit a complaint in person, through postal operators and on the website of the Prosecutor General's Office.

The prosecutor's office has 30 days to consider the complaint. But if the essence of the application is not clear, then consideration will definitely be refused. In general, the entire process of drawing up and submitting a complaint to the Prosecutor General’s Office is no different from applying to other authorities.